Endangered Languages Reading Answers

The Endangered Languages Reading Answers are given here. It will help you in analysing your performance and know your mistakes. It has 14 questions of three different question types.

Table of contents:

• Solution for Endangered Languages
• Endangered Languages IELTS Reading Practice Test
• Passage
• Questions
• Answers with Explanations

Solution for Endangered Languages 

The Endangered Languages reading answers are here in the table below. Use these solutions to know your score and performance.

Answer Table

1. Yes	2. No	3. Yes	4. Not Given
5. Yes	6. No	7. D	8. A
9. C	10. A	11. C	12. A
13. F	14. B

Endangered Languages IELTS Reading Practice Test - Exam Review

Check out our YouTube Channel to Practice Full-Length IELTS Reading Tests Daily

You can test your reading abilities and improve your performance by using the Endangered Languages IELTS reading practice test. Read the question instructions carefully before answering the questions. 

Passage

You are provided with the Endangered Languages reading passage here. You should spend 20 minutes on this passage. Read the passage carefully before answering the questions.

Endangered Languages

1. ‘Nevermind whales, save the languages’, says Peter Monaghan, a graduate of the Australian National University Worried about the loss of rainforests and the ozone. At linguistics meetings in the US, where is the layer? Well, neither of those is doing any worse than the endangered-language issue that has of late been a large majority of the 6,000 to 7,000 languages that are something of a flavor of the month, they remain in use on Earth. One-half of the survivors will show growing evidence that not all approaches to this will almost certainly be gone by 2050, while 40% more preservation of languages will be particularly will probably be well on their way out. In their place, helpful. Some linguists boast that, for example, almost all humans will speak one of a handful of more and more sophisticated means of capturing mega languages – Mandarin, English, and Spanish.
2. Linguists know what causes languages to disappear, but less often remarked is what happens on the way to disappearance: languages’ vocabularies, grammar, and expressive potential all diminish as one language is replaced by another. ‘Say a community goes over from speaking a traditional Aboriginal language to speaking a creole*,’ says Australian Nick Evans, a leading authority on Aboriginal languages, ‘you leave behind a language where there’s a very fine vocabulary for the landscape. All that is gone in a creole. You’ve just got a few words like ‘gum tree’ or whatever. As speakers become less able to express the wealth of knowledge that has filled ancestors’ lives with meaning over millennia, it’s no wonder that communities tend to become demoralized.’
3. If the losses are so huge, why are relatively few linguists combating the situation? Australian linguists, at least, have achieved a great deal in terms of preserving traditional languages. Australian governments began in the 1970s to support an initiative that has resulted in good documentation of most of the 130 remaining Aboriginal languages. In England, another Australian, Peter Austin, has directed one of the world’s most active efforts to limit language loss, at the University of London. Austin heads a program that has trained many documentary linguists in England as well as in language-loss hotspots such as West Africa and South America.
4. At linguistics meetings in the US, where the endangered language issue has of late been something of a flavor of the month, there is growing evidence that not all approaches to the preservation of languages will be particularly helpful. Some linguists are boasting, for example, of more and more sophisticated means of capturing languages: digital recording and storage, and internet and mobile phone technologies. But these are encouraging the ‘quick dash’ style of recording trips: fly-in, switch on a digital recorder, fly home, download to the hard drive, and store gathered material for future research. That’s not quite what some endangered-language specialists have been seeking for more than 30 years. Most loud and untiring has been Michael Krauss, of the University of Alaska. He has often complained that linguists are playing with non-essentials while most of their raw data is disappearing.
5. Who is to blame? That prominent linguists Noam Chomsky, Krauss, and many others. Or, more precisely, they blame those linguists who have been obsessed with his approaches. Linguists who go out into communities to study, document, and describe languages, argue that theoretical linguists, who draw conclusions about how languages work, have had so much influence that linguistics has largely ignored the continuing disappearance of languages. Chomsky, from his post at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has been a great man of theoretical linguistics for far longer than he has been known as a political commentator. His landmark work of 1957 argues that all languages exhibit certain universal grammatical features, encoded in the human mind. American linguists, in particular, have focused largely on theoretical concerns ever since, even while doubts have mounted about Chomsky’s universal.
6. Austin and Co. are in no doubt that because languages are unique, even if they do tend to have common underlying features, creating dictionaries and grammar requires prolonged and dedicated work. This requires that documentary linguists observe not only languages’ structural subtleties but also related social, historical, and political factors. Such work calls for persistent funding of field scientists who may sometimes have to venture into harsh and even hazardous places. Once there, they may face difficulties such as community suspicion. As Nick Evans says, a community who speaks an endangered language may have reasons to doubt or even oppose efforts to preserve it. They may have seen support and funding for such work come and go. They may have given up using the language with their children, believing they will benefit from speaking a more widely understood one. Plenty of students continue to be drawn to the intellectual thrill of linguistics fieldwork. That’s all the more reason to clear away barriers, contend, Evans, Austin, and others.
7. The highest barrier, they agree, is that the linguistics profession’s emphasis on theory gradually wears down the enthusiasm of linguists who work in communities. Chomsky disagrees. He has recently begun to speak in support of language preservation. But his linguistic, as opposed to humanitarian, the argument is, let’s say, unsentimental: the loss of a language, he states, ‘is much more of a tragedy for linguists whose interests are mostly theoretical, like me, than for linguists who focus on describing specific languages, since it means the permanent loss of the most relevant data for general theoretical work’. At the moment, few institutions award doctorates for such work, and that’s the way it should be, he reasons. In linguistics, as in every other discipline, he believes that good descriptive work requires thorough theoretical understanding and should also contribute to building new theories. But that’s precisely what documentation does, objects Evans. The process of immersion in a language, to extract, analyze and sum it up, deserves a Ph.D. because it is ‘the most demanding intellectual task a linguist can engage in’.

Questions

Questions 1 - 6

Do the following statements agree with the views of the author in the Reading Passage? Write in boxes 1 - 6 on your answer sheet

YES: if the statement matches the information
NO: if the statement does not match the information
NOT GIVEN: if no information is available

1. By 2050 only a small number of languages will be flourishing.
2. Australian academics’ efforts to record existing Aboriginal languages have been too limited.
3. The use of technology In language research is proving unsatisfactory in some respects.
4. Chomsky’s political views have overshadowed his academic work.
5. Documentary linguistics studies require long-term financial support.
6. Chomsky’s attitude to disappearing languages is too emotional.

Questions 7 - 10

Choose the correct letter, A, B, C, or D.

7. The writer mentions rainforests and the ozone layer.

1. because he believes anxiety about environmental issues is unfounded.
2. to demonstrate that academics in different disciplines share the same problems.
3. because they exemplify what is wrong with the attitudes of some academics.
4. to make the point that the public should be equally concerned about languages.

8. What does Nick Evans say about speakers of creole?

1. They lose the ability to express ideas that are part of their culture.
2. Older and younger members of the community have difficulty communicating.
3. They express their ideas more clearly and concisely than most people.
4. Accessing practical information causes problems for them.

9. What is similar about West Africa and South America, from the linguist’s point of view?

1. The English language is widely used by academics and teachers.
2. The documentary linguists who work there were trained by Australians.
3. Local languages are disappearing rapidly in both places.
4. There are now only a few undocumented languages there.

10. Michael Krauss has frequently pointed out that.

1. Linguists are failing to record languages before they die out.
2. Linguists have made poor use of improvements in technology.
3. Linguistics has declined in popularity as an academic subject.
4. Linguistics departments are underfunded in most universities.

Questions 11 - 14
Complete each sentence with the correct ending A-G below. Write the correct letter A - G in boxes 11 - 14 on your answer sheet.

11. Linguists like Peter Austin believe that every language is unique
12. Nick Evans suggests a community may resist attempts to save its language
13. Many young researchers are interested in doing practical research
14. Chomsky supports work in descriptive linguistics

even though it is in danger of disappearing. provided that it has a strong basis in theory. although it may share certain universal characteristics because there is a practical advantage to it so long as the drawbacks are clearly understood. in spite of the prevalence of theoretical linguistics. until they realize what is involved

Answers for Endangered Languages with Explanations

Endangered Languages reading answers with explanations are given here to help you understand each answer. These will help you analyze your performance and mistakes.

1. Answer: Yes
Explanation: Paragraph A, 3rd Line. One-half of the survivors will show growing evidence that not all approaches to this will almost certainly be gone by 2050, while 40% more preservation of languages will be particularly will probably be well on their way out. In their place, helpful. As the line here states that a huge number of languages will perish away by 2050.

2. Answer: No
Explanation: Paragraph B, 4th Line. ‘Say a community goes over from speaking a traditional Aboriginal language to speaking a creole*,’ says Australian Nick Evans, a leading authority on Aboriginal languages, ‘you leave behind a language where there’s a very fine vocabulary for the landscape. All that is gone in a creole. The Australian academies have tried to preserve Aboriginal languages as they have explained here in the sentence above. They have put efforts to sustain these languages.

3. Answer: Yes
Explanation: Paragraph D, 4th Line. Some linguists are boasting, for example, of more and more sophisticated means of capturing languages: digital recording and storage, and internet and mobile phone technologies. But these are encouraging the ‘quick dash’ style of recording trips: fly-in, switch on a digital recorder, fly home, download to the hard drive, and store gathered material for future research. They believe that up to some aspects, technology is not helping to preserve the languages, like, digital recording and storage are encouraging a quick recording which just stays in a hard drive stored and not used until in need. Hence, the answer is yes.

4. Answer: Not Given
Explanation: Not Available. No information regarding Chwoksy’s views affecting his work has been mentioned in the passage. Hence, the answer is not given.

5. Answer: Yes
Explanation: Paragraph F, 3rd Line. This requires that documentary linguists observe not only languages’ structural subtleties but also related social, historical, and political factors. Such work calls for persistent funding of field scientists who may sometimes have to venture into harsh and even hazardous places. To do a study, documentary linguists require to study a list of factors, which not only requires time but also monetary resources, hence, the answer is yes.

6. Answer: No
Explanation: Paragraph G, 4th Line. But his linguistic, as opposed to humanitarian, argument, is, let’s say, unsentimental: the loss of a language, he states, ‘is much more of a tragedy for linguists whose interests are mostly theoretical, like me, than for linguists who focus on describing specific languages, since it means the permanent loss of the most relevant data for general theoretical work’. As the line suggests, Chowksy was not an emotional man as he stated without any sentiments regarding the loss of languages. Hence, the answer is no.

7. Answer: D
Explanation: Paragraph A, 1st Line. ‘Nevermind whales, save the languages’, says Peter Monaghan, a graduate of the Australian National University Worried about the loss of rainforests and the ozone.

8. Answer: A
Explanation: Paragraph B, 5th Line. Australian Nick Evans, a leading authority on Aboriginal languages, ‘You leave behind a language where there’s a very fine vocabulary for the landscape. All that is gone in a creole.

9. Answer: C
Explanation: Paragraph C, 7th Line. Austin heads a program that has trained many documentary linguists in England as well as in language-loss hotspots such as West Africa and South America. Both places are losing their local languages at a rapid pace.

10. Answer: A
Explanation: Paragraph D, 10th Line. Most loud and untiring has been Michael Krauss, of the University of Alaska. He has often complained that linguists are playing with non-essentials while most of their raw data is disappearing. Krauss mentioned that linguists are late in recording the raw data which disappears before they get to it because they are busy with non-essential things.

11. Answer: C
Explanation: Paragraph F, 1st Line. Austin and Co. are in no doubt that because languages are unique, even if they do tend to have common underlying features, creating dictionaries and grammar requires prolonged and dedicated work. 

12. Answer: A
Explanation: Paragraph F, 8th Line. As Nick Evans says, a community who speaks an endangered language may have reasons to doubt or even oppose efforts to preserve it.

13. Answer: F
Explanation: Paragraph E, 3rd Line. Linguists who go out into communities to study, document, and describe languages, argue that theoretical linguists, who draw conclusions about how languages work, have had so much influence that linguistics has largely ignored the continuing disappearance of languages.

14. Answer: B
Explanation: Paragraph G, 10th Line. In linguistics, as in every other discipline, he believes that good descriptive work requires thorough theoretical understanding and should also contribute to building new theories. Chowksy believes that if linguistics has a good theory basis, then it is worth supporting.

Other Reading Tests 

• Segway into the future reading answer
• Life casting and art reading answers