Life but not as we know it Reading Answers

We have provided the Life but not as we know it reading practice test below. It consists of 13 questions, 7 of which are about Summary Completion, 4 from the matching features question categories, and 2 multiple choice questions.

Table of contents:

• Solution for Life but not as we know it
• Life but not as we know it IELTS Reading Practice Test
• Passage
• Questions
• Answers with Explanations

Solution for Life but not as we know it

The following table comprises of Life but not as we know it reading answers.

Answer Table

1. SIZE	5. NARROW	9. A	13. D
2. NEVER	6. COMPOSITION	10. B
3. MISTAKE	7. DEFINING	11. C
4. PLANET	8. C	12. A

Life but not as we know it IELTS Reading Practice Test - Exam Review

Check out our YouTube Channel to Practice Full-Length IELTS Reading Tests Daily

We have provided Life but not as we know it reading answers so that you can get an understanding on the actual IELTS reading test as well as the difficulty level of the reading module.You can increase your chances of getting a high band score on the actual IELTS exam by increasing the number of different IELTS Reading question types that you practice answering.

Passage

We have provided a Life but not as we know it reading passage below, read it carefully and answer the questions 1-13.

Life but not as we know it

1. Astrobiology is arguably the trendiest buzzword in science after genomics. Like genomics, it is as hip as it is hard to define. Broadly speaking, it is an umbrella term for efforts of many scientists working in diverse fields to understand the conditions of life in the universe, whether on Earth or elsewhere.
   
   
2. The canvas is, in fact, so broad that many scientists might be astrobiologists without knowing it: astrobiology adds glamor to all science, from astronomy to zoology. Those with long memories and a cynical mind will soon have all this before. Once upon a time, there was a research programme called exobiology. Is astrobiology a new name for repackaged goods?
   
   
3. No, for two reasons. First, many discoveries made in the past decade have set people thinking, once again, about life elsewhere. For example, hardly a month goes by without the discovery of yet another planet orbiting a distant star. And whatever the truth about the much-disputed claims for fossils in Martian meteorites, the controversy has rehabilitated the idea of panspermia: that life can spread between planets.
   
   
4. Second, astrobiology is almost a trademarked term. The Nasa Astrobiology Institute is a virtual campus linking research centers with universities, all devoted to learning more about the general principles governing the origin of life in the universe. Significantly, Nature magazine recently looked at astrobiology in all its forms, from the quest to understand how life began on Earth to the prospects of finding intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.
   
   
5. Not that this should be a cause for wide-eyed celebration, say its critics. Ironically, the most vociferous of these come not from the world of science but from science fiction. Brian Aldiss, veteran writer, critic, and leading light of the genre, dismisses our current obsession with life elsewhere, however much it is justified by science, as an expensively scratched itch.
   
   
6. Aliens, he argues, are a manifestation of a fundamental human urge to populate the universe with ‘others’, whether gods, ghosts, little green men, or cartoon characters. Scientists should beware of taking science fiction too seriously: aliens are used as plot devices, but this does not make them real.
   
   
7. A rather different criticism comes from scientists-turned-science fiction writers Jack Cohen and Ian Stewart. Both are academics – Cohen is a biologist, Stewart is a mathematician — but they have worked in SF, most recently on their novel Wheelers. Their argument with astrobiology is not that aliens might not exist, but that we cannot help be constrained in our search.
   
   All organisms on Earth, from the tiniest bacterium to the biggest whales, are constructed according to the same rules. Earthly genetic information is carried in genes made of DNA, earthly life is based on polymers of carbon, and its chemistry happens in liquid water. Because this kind of life is all we know, we tend to think that the same rules need to apply everywhere.
   
   
8. So, when probes land on Mars, or scientists look at Martian meteorites, they tend to look for the kinds of vital signs that betray earthly organisms when we have absolutely no reason for thinking that life elsewhere should be earthlike, or that our definition of life cannot be based more broadly. When the Mars Rover sat and stared at a rock, how do we know that the rock was not staring right back?
   
   
9. It is a fairly simple matter to come up with a definition of life that is based on what it does, rather than what it is made of. It is much more difficult, however, to make such a definition stick, preventing the term from becoming so inclusive as to be meaningless. You might start by posting three rules. The first is that life requires the existence of information that can be reproduced and inherited, with variation. Second, that living systems seem to create order and structure and maintain it in the face of chaos. Third, that a living system has to work hard to maintain its structure, and as soon as it stops doing this it degenerates.
   
   
10. These rules seem, at first, to be fairly precise, in as much they weed out quietly observant Martian surface rocks. But as Cohen and Stewart show in their novel, it is possible to imagine entities that follow all three rules and which appear to be alive, but which bear absolutely no resemblance to terrestrial organisms. In Wheelers, they describe civilizations of floating, methane-breathing balloons in the atmosphere of Jupiter and organisms made of magnetically—confined the plasma, living in the outer layers of the sun.
    
    
11. Other science fiction writers have imagined life on the surfaces of neutron stars, inside computers, or even in interstellar space. In his latest novel, Look to Windward, Lain M Banks describes organisms the size of continents, supporting entire civilizations as their intestinal parasites. All could be said to constitute life, but in Dr. McCoy’s immortal phrase from Star Trek, ‘not as we know it’.
    
    
12. Could this mean that astrobiology, the aims of which are universal, is really no more than a parochial exercise? We might never know — perhaps even when we are visited by aliens from the other side of the galaxy who try, frantically, to gain our attention, by waving under our noses whatever it is they have under such circumstances. It will not be their fault that they will be microscopic and destroyed by a single sneeze. As Cohen and Stewart conclude in Wheelers, ‘Life goes on everywhere.’

Questions

Questions 1-7 

Complete the summary below. Choose the answers from the box. There are more choices than spaces, so you will not need to use all of them.

The same biological and chemical principles (for example) determine the make-up of all terrestrial life forms, whatever their 1…………… We often assume that this is the case throughout the universe, as we have 2…………… observed other kinds of organisms. Scientists, therefore, make the 3……….. of searching for indications of Earth-style living things when examining material from another 4……….., where the nature of any life may lie far outside their own 5………… definition. On the other hand, if the focus is not on 6……….. but on behavior, there is a risk of 7…………….. life much too broadly.

Questions 8-11

The text refers to the ideas of various science fiction writers. Match writers A—C with the points in 8-11. You may use any of the writers more than once.

List of writers

1. Aldiss
2. Banks
3. Cohen & Stewart

Questions 12-13

Choose the correct option A,B,C or D.

12. The writer believes that astrobiology

may now be the second most fashionable science.
is very similar to exobiology.
has proved that a meteorite from Mars contains fossils.
is not taken seriously by scientific publications.

13. Which of the following statements best describes the writer’s main purpose in Reading Passage?

1. to describe the latest scientific developments in the study of the universe
2. to explain why there is growing interest in the study of astrobiology
3. to show that science fiction writers have nothing useful to say about aliens
4. to suggest that astrobiology may not help us find extraterrestrial life

Answers for Life but not as we know it with Explanations

The Life but not as we know it answers with Explanations are given below. It will assist you in understanding the format of the reading test and will allow you to correct your errors.

1. Answer: SIZE

Explanation: The paragraph makes it quite evident that every type of organism, from microscopic bacteria to enormous whales, has the same basic structure.

2. Answer: NEVER
Explanation: Since we don't know enough about life, we assume that all living things operate according to known principles.

3. Answer: MISTAKE
Explanation: The phrase implies that scientists look for clues that mimic the traits of organisms on earth when they come across an individual or object from another planet.

4. Answer: PLANET
Explanation: The phrase implies that scientists look for clues that mimic the traits of organisms on earth when they come across any being or object from another planet. We have no justification, however, for why their traits might be the same as those of creatures on Earth.

5. Answer: NARROW
Explanation: The statement can be taken to mean that the universe is home to a wide variety of creatures. In contrast to it, the base of our knowledge of life is limited to terrestrial organisms. We must widen our understanding in order to comprehend life on other worlds.

6. Answer: COMPOSITION
Explanation: The line implies that a better definition of life would place more emphasis on its activities, or "what it does," as opposed to its constituent parts, or "what it is made of."

7. Answer: DEFINING
Explanation: Instead than focusing on its makeup, a better definition of life would emphasize its functions. A broader definition would be useless in any other case.

8. Answer: C
Explanation: The eighth paragraph makes it quite evident that every type of organism, from microscopic bacteria to enormous whales, has the same basic structure. The phrase implies that scientists look for clues that mimic the traits of organisms on earth when they come across any being or object from another planet.

9. Answer: A
Explanation: Humans are eager for other living forms to coexist with us on Earth, as the previous line made clear.

10. Answer: B
Explanation: In his book, Banks makes the assumption that a very high number of enormous species could be inhabiting the entire society.

11. Answer:  C
Explanation: Since we don't know enough about life, we assume that all living things operate according to known principles. We don't believe that this knowledge can be expanded to such an extent.

12. Answer: A
Explanation: The writer makes the initial assumption that astrobiology is perhaps the second-most popular science, behind genomics.

13. Answer: D
Explanation: The author makes the assumption that even if alien species ever visit Earth, we may never learn about them.

Other Reading Tests

• A new threat in yellowstone reading answer
• The scarlet pimpernel of the vatican reading answers
• Controlling deathwatch beetles reading answers