Research shows that overeating is as harmful as smoking - IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Topic

The Research shows that overeating is as harmful as smoking is an IELTS writing task 2 agree or disagree essay where you will be showing your expressing opinion. You need to manage time between two writing tasks. In the IELTS writing task 2 post, we have provided you with sample answers for the four band scores. Analyze the answers to understand the format and to enhance your writing speed.

Check Out our YouTube Channel to Practice Full-Length IELTS Listening Tests Daily

Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

Model Sample Answer 1 Band 8 - Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree?

It is apparent that overeating has devastating repercussions on human health. Therefore, some researchers believe that advertising some foods should be prohibited as it is equally harmful to smoking. However, I disagree strongly with this statement. In a subsequent essay, I will elaborate on my views with relevant facts and examples.
To begin with, I do not believe that advertisements are the particular cause of overeating however it is similarly detrimental to health as smoking. Worldwide fast food is gaining popularity since it is inexpensive, tasty, and simple to prepare. Therefore, consumers are compelled to consume easily available street cuisine. Moreover, the eating habits of today’s generations rely more on fast food rather than on home-cooked meals. In addition, everyone has the fundamental right to select what they eat. Hence, their own choice forces them to consume harmful foods, not advertisements.
On the contrary, advertising unquestionably influences the thinking and eating habits of viewers, a warning does not imply that it leads them to choose an unhealthy diet. Instead, it raises awareness and provides important information about a healthy diet. For instance, advertisements can inform consumers about the amount of energy, fat, calories, and vitamins in food products, allowing them to determine whether the item is worth the risk to their health. Moreover, despite television commercials, public campaigns can educate ignorant people about overeating risks.
In conclusion, I believe the government should not place restrictions on advertising programmes since, despite luring customers, advertising also makes them more sensible. Ministries should establish seminars or special programmes to raise public awareness of this problem in order to reduce its prevalence.

(268 words)

Model Sample Answer 2 Band 7.5 - Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree?

As with smoking, overuse of some types of food products is suggested to have comparable negative health impacts. In many nations, it is thought that advertising for such products is the primary reason, hence the government should outlaw advertising food items just like tobacco products. In my opinion, there are numerous realistic methods to combat overeating.
To begin with, there is no strong evidence that prohibiting advertising efforts for certain types of food reduces obesity rates. Children choose fast food on a daily basis primarily owing to advertising by companies such as Burger King and Subway. Furthermore, social media channels such as Instagram, Facebook, and television are unable to effectively promote their true idea. In long term, youngsters may be susceptible to obesity, which may lead to health issues such as heart-related issues. Secondly, some food firms would hire personalities such pop stars and movie actors to appear in their advertising. Given that prohibiting advertisements for foods may be ineffective in reducing their consumption rates, it may be pointless to prohibit them.
I would argue, however, that there are incomparable approaches to mitigate this issue. First, there are negative impacts of overeating for the health of pupils, thus new teaching initiatives should be implemented in schools to assist children to comprehend. To be more precise, obesity and other health-related issues should be introduced to the curriculum. Moreover, governments should also impose a greater tax on various types of food, so increasing the price of these items. Due to their exorbitant pricing, consumers may be discouraged from ingesting them.
In conclusion, I feel that the issue of overeating can be effectively minimised by prohibiting marketing efforts; nevertheless, there are more viable ways to curb this occurrence.

(285 words)

Model Sample Answer 3 Band 7 - Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree?

Researchers have demonstrated in a number of studies that overeating is as dangerous as smoking a cigar. As there a ban on cigarette advertising, it is urged that advertising for fast food, which is regarded to be its primary cause, also be prohibited. Everyone has the right to consume less or more food, hence I disagree with the statement. Moreover, certain junk meals contain critical elements that advertising companies wish to emphasise. 
To begin with, despite the belief that overeating is as hazardous as smoking a cigar, a prohibition on food advertising that entices consumers to consume more cannot prevent them from eating more. The explanation is that people are addicted to fast food and will consume it at any cost, even if ads for these foods are prohibited. In addition, they consider eating more or less a fundamental right. Consequently, a restriction on fast food ads will only foster resentment towards the government.
Additionally, certain precooked foods include essential nutrients. Therefore, if individuals choose to consume ever-greater quantities of food, they cannot have major health issues. They will be able to satisfy there cravings and hunger. As a result, there is no need for a restriction on these food commercials, whereas cigarettes contain hazardous substances that might be harmful to human health. As a result, the marketing of dangerous substances and the use of those substances are prohibited.
In conclusion, it is no longer necessary to restrict the promotion of fast food publications. Due to the fact that eating less or more is a matter of personal choice, even if the advertising of certain foods is banned.

(268 words)

Model Sample Answer 4 Band 6.5 - Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes is banned. Do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, overeating has become one of the most important issues in the most of societies. According to some people, advertisements play a crucial part in the development of this problem, and the government should prohibit the advertising of certain foods in the same manner as cigarettes. Even while the influence advertising on individuals in this subject is apparent, I believe there are other elements that contribute to people's propensity to overeat.
On the one hand, there are numerous reasons why I believe the promotion of such foods should be prohibited. First and foremost, as a result of western cultural impact, a large number of residents consume unhealthy, hot foods. For instance, a study demonstrates that consuming restaurant meals for an extended period of time results in a multitude of people suffering from health issues and weight issues. Second, it is common knowledge that many persons consume junk food to demonstrate their social standing. In other words, in several places, overeating is frequent due to competition.
On the other side, people today have an unhealthy lifestyle that contributes to obesity, where eating habits are a significant issue. For example, skipping a meal, which is common among adolescents and young adults, consuming an excessive amount of prepackaged meals, and many other factors can easily lead to overeating. In addition, watching television or working while eating is detrimental to our health and may promote overeating. Moreover, mental problems might alter people's eating patterns. 
In conclusion, I believe that the advertisement of specific food products may be both beneficial and detrimental, therefore it ultimately depends on ourselves, our decisions, and our desire to live a healthy lifestyle.

(275 words)

Get all the model answers in the form of research shows that overeating is as harmful as smoking pdf

Next sample essay for practice: Health care should not be provided for free