The development of tourism contributed to English - IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Topic

The development of tourism contributed to English question is provided below in this blog. It is of IELTS writing task 2 advantage and disadvantage essay where you must discuss both merits and drawbacks of the topic. In this test, the candidate's language ability, knowledge, and vocabulary skills will be evaluated. Please review our sample answers for four distinct bands to score better in your IELTS writing task 2 exams and to improve your writing skills.

Check Out our YouTube Channel to Practice Full-Length IELTS Listening Tests Daily

The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally. What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one language in the world?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

Model Sample Answer 1 Band 8 - The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally. What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one language in the world?

The rise of tourism throughout the world has contributed to the language of English gaining more prominence as a result of the revolution it has caused. Some people have the opinion that this will result in English being the only language that can be used in legal matters. The primary benefits and drawbacks of having a single universal language are going to be discussed throughout this essay.

Ease of communication and better international relations are two major benefits of using a common language rather than the languages of individual countries. There would be much less difficulty in gaining access to the resources of other countries and communicating with their citizens if a universal language were in use. For instance, if a Canadian resident were able to communicate freely with a Japanese person, it would boost tourism revenue for Japan. In addition, Japanese people are known for their dedication and hard work, which means they may have useful suggestions for the Canadian economy. A second benefit is better communication between nations. For instance, having a common language would make it less difficult to fill the talent gap by exchanging foreign workers.

On the other hand, losing localism is the biggest drawback. It's possible to make English a country's primary language, but it's hard for everyone to speak it like a native because country accents vary. For instance, Canadians, Australians, and Americans speak English but their accents differ.  Making English the primary language also destroys the local language and culture that the ancestors have preserved.

In conclusion, while a single universal language is undoubtedly beneficial to each country and improves relations among them, it is unquestionably detrimental to the local language and harms local culture in the long run.

(287 words)

Model Sample Answer 2 Band 7.5 - The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally. What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one language in the world?

Due to the fact that the tourism industry has been making its way around the world over the course of the past few years, the popularity of the English language has increased significantly. As a result, there are those who believe that the language that is spoken the most frequently, English, will eventually come to dominate all of the other languages. Having only one language spoken throughout the world does, however, have a few drawbacks.

On the one hand, having a universal language would remove barriers to communication and promote mutual understanding between nations and there would be widespread economic growth and increased international trade as a result. For instance, when all parties are fluent in each other's language, there are no language barriers, and everyone is on the same page; this simplifies interactions and eliminates misunderstandings between nations. Moreover, if everyone just used the same language, it would be super easy to interact with people from all over the world.

The widespread adoption of a common language would undoubtedly simplify international interactions, but it would come at the expense of local languages and cultures as well as the tourism industry. In other words, if there were only one language spoken everywhere, linguistic diversity and progress would eventually come to a halt. Without these types of celebrations, the tourism industry will also suffer greatly. Therefore, a global monolingual English language may pose a grave danger to localized traditions all over the world.

In conclusion, the argument for making English a universal language will have long-term negative effects on native tongues and cultures all over the globe. Many advantages would result from standardizing on English, but the drawbacks would be overpowering.

(280 words)

Model Sample Answer 3 Band 7 - The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally. What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one language in the world?

As international travel has increased in popularity, English has replaced other languages as the routine for everyday interaction. Some people think that this pattern will ultimately lead to English's dominance as the global language but this has some disadvantages too.

With a universal language, people can more easily communicate with one another. As a result, tourism, trade, and business will all improve. As the economy improves, more people will desire to visit other countries. Travelers will raise the standard of living for locals in many parts of the world. When people from different countries speak the same language, misunderstandings are eliminated, which is a huge boon to foreign ties. To sum up, it will enhance the world as a place where people are able to communicate with one another.

In terms of disadvantages, because of the emphasis on only one language, regional languages may die. If every child in school is taught only English, there will be nobody left to pass on regional languages to coming generations. This is illustrated by the disappearance of native American languages on the North and South American continents as a result of the English language's influence. Furthermore, many great works and epics have been written in ancient languages such as Sanskrit and Greek. Even if we translated these works into English, the complexity and elegance of the language would be lost.  Also, for many people, language is not just a way of communicating but also a source of identity and access to their cultures.

In conclusion, while a common language would undoubtedly bring people closer together, the potential harm it could cause to the world's everyday speech and classical languages must be taken into account.

(281 words)

Model Sample Answer 4 Band 6 - The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally. What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one language in the world?

Some people assume that English, which is the most commonly spoken language in the world right now, will one day take over all other languages and make them all go away. Having one language would help people understand each other and the economy grow, but it would also have some disadvantages.

One language would improve international communication. Thus, if everyone spoke one language, countries and people worldwide would understand each other, promoting learning, information, and ideas. One language also boosts economic growth. Trade would flourish between countries if everyone spoke the same language, improving the global economy.

On the other hand, there seem to be clear problems with having only one language for the whole world. First of all, it would mean all of the other languages and cultures would end up dying out in the long run. One of the best things about this world is how many different kinds of people live here. Each culture is different, with a distinct way of life and way of seeing the world. If there was only one language, all of these things would be lost. Second, tourism would end due to the lack of reason to travel for fun and interest if everyone used the same language and had the same culture. This would be terrible for the economies of many countries that depend on tourism

To sum up,  having one language for the whole world would be good in some ways, but a lot could be lost too. The priority should be given to keeping regional languages and cultures alive so that future generations can enjoy a rich world heritage.

(270 words)

Get all the model answers in the form of The development of tourism contributed to English pdf.

Next sample essay for practice:

• Some people get into debt