Nowadays scientists and tourists can travel remote natural environment - IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Topic

Nowadays scientists and tourists are allowed to travel to remote natural environments is a ‘advantages and disadvantages’ type of essay. Here you have to explain both the positive and negative sides of the statement and give justification for whether the advantage of this development outweighs the disadvantages. This is one of the IELTS writing task 2 types. Our 4 IELTS writing task 2 advantages and disadvantages model essays will provide you with information and knowledge of how to write this essay according to the different band scores.

Check Out our YouTube Channel to Practice Full-Length IELTS Listening Tests Daily

Nowadays scientists and tourists are allowed to travel to remote natural environments. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

State the benefits and demerits of the given topic from your experience and give your opinion regarding if the pros outweigh the cons.

You should write at least 250 words.

Model Sample Answer 1 Band 8 - Nowadays scientists and tourists are allowed to travel to remote natural environments. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Earth has been acknowledged to possess a wealth of natural riches, scenic beauty, polar ice caps, mountain ranges, hidden terrains, and so on, since time immemorial. Scientists and curious sightseers alike frequently embark on journeys throughout the globe in search of undiscovered natural wonders. This essay will discuss the pros and cons of these investigations and conclude with a reasonable conclusion.

Studying the local population, flora, and fauna, and the impact of climate changes over time is one of the benefits of exploring distant natural ecosystems by researchers and visitors. Scientists are free to conduct studies that may one day shed light on the origins of life, the functioning of the planet's climate, and other fundamental questions. Travelers to the area will be able to soak up the natural magnificence of the area, soothe their minds and bodies, and generally have a great time on vacation. Many tourists, for instance, seek out remote and isolated locations for their vacations so that they can reconnect with nature and their own inner peace.

However, these types of expeditions can cost a lot of money. Travelers in really far locales may put their lives in jeopardy owing to a lack of essential amenities including food, water, medical care, and other necessities. In addition, the impacts of environmental and climatic changes on their lives remain largely unknown. There is a concern that more visitors will visit as a result of these explorations, ruining the area's natural attractiveness and threatening the native species habitats.

Summing up, there are good reasons to support any point of view, as we have shown. Despite this, I believe the benefits of exploration outweigh the drawbacks, as it not only leads to significant discoveries but also helps to tame the innate human thirst for excitement and adventure.

(297 words)

Model Sample Answer 2 Band 7.5 - Nowadays scientists and tourists are allowed to travel to remote natural environments. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

These formerly inaccessible regions of nature are now open to tourists because of technological advancements. I think the drawbacks of this tendency outweigh the benefits to a far greater degree.

There are positive aspects to exploring wild, uninhabited areas. To begin, this is a novel and intriguing kind of transportation. Traveling to new urban centers or countries has become routine for many, therefore it may be more exhilarating for them to discover the South Pole or the Amazon rainforest. They get knowledge and memories that will last a lifetime. Second, it's possible that scientists, in particular, can learn more about the natural environment if they travel to more isolated regions. Scientists, for instance, can study polar bears, which live in isolation from people, by traveling to the North Pole.

Nevertheless, I think there are many more negative repercussions of this trend. The first is that if one is adequately trained, traveling to natural locations far from civilization can be safe. The South Pole, for example, has extremely low average temperatures, which can have catastrophic effects on human health. Forest travel is risky because of the possibility of being attacked by wild creatures. Moreover, travel costs tend to be expensive because exploring remote areas typically necessitates a substantial financial commitment to research and assuring the safety of tourists. So only scientists and the affluent can afford this activity, so only a selected few will benefit from this innovation.
                                                                                                                                                                                  
In conclusion, It is certain that the downsides of individuals being able to visit far-flung locations outweigh the rewards.

(256 words)

Model Sample Answer 3 Band 7 - Nowadays scientists and tourists are allowed to travel to remote natural environments. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

Modern times have opened up previously inaccessible natural areas to tourists and environmental scientists. In this essay, I'll make the case that the advantages of this strategy much outweigh any potential downsides. The essay will begin by showing that the main benefits are a reduction in stress and an improvement in the local economy, and it will then go on to show that the primary disadvantage is not the creation of pollution but rather the perception of that as a problem.

The primary motivation for visiting undeveloped wilderness places is the pursuit of serenity. People today are under a lot of stress from their jobs, and as a result, some of them are looking to escape to a peaceful natural environment to refocus and recharge. Moreover, this can aid scientists in locating uncommon plant species that can be used for the study of the prosperity of the community. For instance, according to research published in The Times of India, many conventional medicines are derived from natural herbs that were discovered by scientists in faraway lands decades ago.

Some people think that opening up natural areas to tourists and researchers will ruin them for everyone. The reason for this is that a growing number of visitors would visit these areas in the years to come, posing a threat to the ecological system. Many backpackers to these locations are conscious of the likelihood of environmental damage, so they take measures to minimize their impact. In addition, governments implement rigorous standards to preserve the tranquillity of these areas. 

The idea that exploring natural areas will lead to pollution is erroneous, but the reality that doing so helps to achieve peace and development of that area more than makes up for it.

(288 words)

Model Sample Answer 4 Band 6 - Nowadays scientists and tourists are allowed to travel to remote natural environments. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

The capacity to visit far places like the Arctic and numerous islands presents both travel and scientific advantages and environmental preservation concerns. The benefits far exceed the drawbacks, in my opinion.

The ability to visit out-of-the-way places comes with some externalized costs. Even if local governments do their utmost to protect isolated areas from contamination, visitors are still likely to experience some adverse effects. South Pacific islands are a prime illustration of this. The Philippines, in particular, have become a major tourist destination, leading to an increase in waste and the modification of the local ecosystem to make room for hotels and eating establishments. In a similar vein, the local culture is in jeopardy. As more and more outsiders and contemporary goods make their way into previously undiscovered areas, a lot of indigenous communities are finding it difficult to hold on to their traditions.

However, the main strengths are more academic and recreational journeys. Areas that aren't being used by modern civilizations are useless. From uninhabited islands to regions with harsh climates like that of Mount Everest, several previously off-limits destinations have become desirable sites for the adventurous traveller. The positives are even more palpable for academic scholars. The Galapagos Islands are the most well-known example of this, as they were the site of Darwin's scientific work on which his theory of evolution was based more than a century ago. Since then, countless discoveries and advancements in fields including archaeology, medicine, marine life, and the environment have emerged from the capacity to explore new places.

To sum up, while tourism can have deleterious repercussions, I think that exploring previously uncharted areas is generally a good thing. While the outcomes of such travel far outweigh the risks, governments nonetheless need to impose regulations to protect citizens.

(295 words)

Get all the model answers in the form of Nowadays scientists and tourists are allowed to travel to remote natural environments.pdf

Next sample essay for practice:

• By punishing murderers with death penalty