Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries - IELTS writing task 2 essay topics

The subject for this IELTS writing task 2 is "Rich nations should not employ skilled labour from poor countries." You must write at least 250 words in 40 minutes for an agree and disagree essay. You are supposed to state your opinion with the statement in IELTS Writing Task 2 agree and disagree questions. For your benefit, we have included four answers related to band scores below.

Check Out our YouTube Channel to Practice Full-Length IELTS Listening Tests Daily

Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

Model Sample Answer 1 Band 8 - Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

With globalisation, people are migrating abroad in search of better job opportunities with higher financial incentives. Some argue that developed countries should not recruit educated and trained labour from developing countries because they need them more. I partially disagree with the statement, since there are limitations for jobs offered in developing countries, which force the unemployed to turn towards foreign countries.

Third-world countries fall under the category of being poor. These nations are nevertheless in the development phase. Despite having a sizable number of qualified applicants, there are only so many seats available, resulting in a sizable portion of the population being jobless. This has an impact on both the country and the people. For instance, India has a huge number of graduates who have appropriate skills. But there are reserved seats for the scheduled castes and tribes, making the general caste helpless. As a last resort, they look for opportunities in developed countries.

People who move abroad to pursue jobs help their families financially. This, in turn, is useful in decreasing poverty in developing countries. This is useful for developed nations as well, because they acquire equally proficient labour from poor countries at a cheaper salary than there.

I also disagree with this, because developing nations can develop and flourish by using the proficiency and expertise of these people. It struggles in the shadows, while developed countries benefit from the success brought by migrant workers. The migrants are treated unfairly; they often receive low pay checks and are discriminated against.

In conclusion, I don't agree with the idea that rich countries shouldn't hire talented people from poor countries because doing so helps the poor countries get rid of poverty and unemployment but also deprives them of developing due to a lack of trained manpower.

(Words 295)

Model Sample Answer 2 Band 7.5 - Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

People move to developed countries for better work prospects, which is an unavoidable truth. It is also true that this trend hampers their own nation's growth in a number of ways. For example, it has an influence on the availability of qualified workers in their home country.

Brain drain has long been a major issue. People often move to rich nations in order to receive a high income that compensates for the time and effort they put in to get their degrees. In fact, the chance to move abroad motivates many students to study better in school. For example, acquiring a degree in medicine is quite expensive and labour-intensive. A medical student will be more motivated to put in the effort required to become a doctor if she is confident that, after completing her studies, she will find a fruitful career overseas. Moreover, by having the opportunity to interact with some of the brightest minds on the planet, talented individuals who relocate to a developed nation will be able to further strengthen their capabilities.

On the contrary, due to this migration, the home country suffers in the absence of skilled workers. Just like doctors, people with IT skills are also migrating to countries like Germany and the UK since they provide a better prospect. As a result, there is a lack of qualified IT workers that can help the country progress technologically. Cyber security and privacy are not as advanced as in other countries, putting citizens' personal information at risk.

To conclude, there seems to be no arguing that skilled labour's migration to developed nations limits those countries' national growth. However, each person has the liberty to decide where they prefer to live and work. Certainly, nations could prevent this practice by providing better opportunities within their own borders.

(Words 299)

Model Sample Answer 3 Band 7 - Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Some people feel that developed countries recruiting trained human resources from underdeveloped nations should be prohibited because those countries require them more. Everyone has a varied opinion on this statement. I believe that affluent nations should employ manpower from these nations, because it gives the individual a chance to flourish.

Unemployment is significant in various developing countries because these nations have a limited availability of jobs. A huge young population there face rejection due to reserved seats as per the government legislations. Recruiting them resolves the problem of unemployment. For example, business administration aspirants are recruited by various multinational companies. The proverb, “kill two birds with one stone” sits well in this situation as both the companies as well as the individuals are benefitted from it. This also decreases poverty that is prevailing in developing nations. It gives a wider window of progress and knowledge to the individuals. For example, the current CEO of Google is an Indian migrant, who moved to America for his job in Google.

Further, when acceptance to international employment is supported, poor nations also win. When advanced economies need skilled employees from the developing world, a demand is produced in those nations, which promotes the development of their internal infrastructure, including better educational institutions. For instance, the Indian tech-related education industry witnessed substantial growth when the United States began recruiting numerous IT personnel in the late twentieth century. Consequently, these employees bring the cosmopolitan culture of developed nations, which alters traditional ideas in third world nations.
To conclude, recruitment of skilled manpower from poor countries is beneficial for both the countries as well as the employees themselves. The education system, infrastructures and so on are improved and advanced. Even the employees achieve their dreams professionally.

(Words 290)

Model Sample Answer 4 Band 6.5 - Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Over the years, the difference between developed and developing countries has been the subject of numerous discussions. One such continual dispute is whether or not developed countries should hire trained labour from less developed countries because some individuals believe that the need for workers is comparatively higher in underdeveloped countries. I firmly believe in this claim because it rips off the poor countries’ prospective development.

Poor countries work painstakingly to create an economy from zero by assembling various resources from every available source. To make the economy effective, they must work diligently. In this scenario, when richer nations lure the labourers, which they get for a lower investment, the undeveloped and emerging nations are often depopulated and in disrepair. Therefore, it is very unethical for advanced economies to tear them apart by stealing the most precious asset of all—the human resource.

The developed nations have a plethora of qualified workers. The underdeveloped countries' manpower, however, is pushed to look for work there in order to save funds. To specify, it is a very frequent occurrence to see when a citizen worth a certain amount of income for their position is dismissed in favour of incorporating somebody from an underdeveloped nation on a lower salary, which is utterly disingenuous to humanity. This, in my opinion, really does an injustice to the developing world, but also to their own residents. Also, I feel that this scenario causes the barrier between a poor and affluent country to widen until it ultimately becomes too huge a gap for all countries and enterprises to take off and break even.

To sum up, I concur with the claims about prohibiting the developed nations from recruiting trained professionals from the poor countries. It hinders the latter from developing and creates a barrier between the nations.

(Words 298)

Get all the model answers in the form of Rich countries should not employ skilled labour for poor countries pdf.

Next sample essay for practice: some people believe that there should be fixed punishment