The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking - IELTS Writing Task 2 Essay Topic

“The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking” is a type of agree or disagree essay in IELTS writing task 2. You will be given a controversial argument, and you will be required to either support or oppose it. Consider the following instances of IELTS writing task 2 agree or disagree sample essays.

Check Out our YouTube Channel to Practice Full-Length IELTS Listening Tests Daily

The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 250 words.

Model Sample Answer 1 Band 8 - The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

People who smoke are seen as misanthropes due to their adverse repercussions on each of our lives. The same argument applies to the use of smartphones. There has been a strong urge in support of banning the usage of mobile phones in important places, similar to the anti-smoking campaign. I fully agree as it goes against human rights and can act as a major distraction occasionally.

Firstly, individuals frequently grumble about being offended by someone using their mobile phones in public spaces. This attitude is undesirable in society and violates human rights. It's going to have both physical and psychological consequences on consumers. The signal produced via mobile phones has adverse effects on the human brain. Whenever a large number of individuals use their mobile phones in public, the chance of someone being identified with a brain tumour drastically increases. Likewise, smartphone alerts and message tones offer a serious hazard to health and well-being. A significant concentration of tension and anxiety may result from interruptions.

Generally, there are many disadvantages connected with the consumption of mobile phones in specific locations and circumstances. Driving while using a mobile phone is an additional example that is particularly harmful. According to a survey, adolescents who were using a mobile phone were engaged in a considerable share of vehicle collisions. Several more factors have a major role in influencing nations to restrict mobile phone use. 

To conclude, smartphones possess their own significant advantages and are considered to make human life easier. Despite the risk of becoming dependent on their use. To minimize the disadvantages and also to demonstrate their benefits, strong regulations are needed.

(273 words)

Model Sample Answer 2 Band 7.5 - The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, with the advancement in technology, mobile phones have become common because of their advanced and useful qualities. Some individuals think that mobile phone use is harmful to the community and should therefore be prohibited in crowded locations, equivalent to cigarettes. While I accept that mobile phone use can occasionally have harmful impacts on public places, I think it is a requirement for individuals and therefore should not be prohibited.

First and foremost, it is clear that the use of cellular phones in public where silence is essential might affect others. In universities, for instance, if you take a loud phone call or receive a loud sound from that incoming call, you might interrupt the research of someone else. This one is considered disrespectful and impolite to surrounding people. Hence, mobile phone configurations should always be customizable for different scenarios to avoid disturbing people.

Moreover, there are multiple reasons why the use of mobile phones shouldn't be outlawed. First, it includes a wide range of useful applications, such as a camera, e-mail, Internet browser, music player, etc. This makes people's lives more convenient for the user. It allows humans to archive daily life memories, strengthen their professions, and entertain themselves in their leisure moments. Secondly, it allows individuals to connect with their family members from any place or during a crisis. For instance, people who do not live together should communicate on a daily phone conversation or webcam conference. Considering all of the benefits mentioned here, it is obvious that cell devices have now become essential to people.

To sum up, mobile phones can indeed be antisocial. But since it is not as dangerous as smoking, it should not be restricted in some public places.

(286 words)

Model Sample Answer 3 Band 7 - The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is suggested that mobile phone usage is quite as antisocial as tobacco consumption and therefore should be equally outlawed. While I believe that mobile phones are harmful in some aspects, I think they offer greater advantages and therefore should not be prohibited in this sense. 

I understand that mobile phones can be unfriendly at times. In rare situations, mobile phone usage might interrupt the studies or activities of everyone else. Individuals can indeed be distracted by ringing handsets or other sounds. Secondly, it can eliminate people from everyone else, leading them to be less linked with each other and to perhaps ignoring their duties. During a social gathering of friends, for instance, everybody appears to be engaged with their mobile phones, leading to much less interaction. And youngsters who use phones in the classroom will find it difficult to concentrate fully just on courses.

Mobile phone usage should be restricted, equivalent to smoking. The mobile phone has a variety of advantages if used wisely. Initially, mobile phones enabled communication with our relatives and friends. We can maintain a secure gap whenever calling or sending an email instead. Moreover, a smartphone is beneficial to both studies and work. It provides numerous life-enhancing apps, such as a language, internet, online ordering, e-Commerce platforms, and many others. Moreover, mobile phone addiction is not as bad as smoking. While smoking is directly hazardous to a person's health, mobile phone usage is less serious.

In summary, I feel that mobiles are in a certain manner antisocial, but I do not believe they should be prohibited.

(261 words)

Model Sample Answer 4 Band 6.5 - The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the 21st century because of technical advancement, there has been an exponential increase in using smartphones around the globe. Even though mobile phone usage seems to have some damaging consequences, I disagree that we all should restrict it in the same approach as smoking. 

There seem to be major benefits to smartphone use that cigarettes do not provide. Firstly, cell phones provide the most cost effective and convenient methods of communicating with others. As a result of the technological revolution, individuals no longer have to deliver expensive, time-consuming, and work letters to interact with their friends and neighbours. Furthermore, phones serve as the foundation of all social networking sites. Hence, it is extremely simple to make friends along the way overseas, demonstrating there is no causal connection connecting cell phones and antisocial activities. 

However, there are various causes for mobile phones not quite as unfriendly as tobacco. Firstly, dopamine in tobacco smoking can adversely affect the health of consumers, whereas cell phones need not produce any hazardous compounds. For instance, while more than two-thirds of those diagnosed with lung cancer smoked a cigarette for just a prolonged period, cell phones are seldom the reason for accidents. Secondly, in communal locations, cigarette smoking is the primary source of danger, as users of mobile phones are generally careless. In contrast, using cell phones in public is one of the simplest methods to maintain silence and express decorum.

To sum up, as cell devices have no disruptive impacts, devices should not be outlawed. I feel that the financial gain of cellular phones is just too significant for their restriction to be discussed.

(270 words)

Get all the model answers in the form of the use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking pdf.

Next sample essay for practice: Modern modes of Transport