Effects of Noise Reading Answers

Roshan.webp

Author

19-09-2025

Effects of Noise  Reading Answers

Know your Effects of Noise Reading Answers as given below. Here, you find the correct answers for all 14 questions.

Solution for Effects of Noise

1. D 5. D 9. A 13. B
2. C 6. F 10. D 14. C
3. A 7. I 11. A  
4. B 8. B 12. E  

For the IELTS reading test, students must practise tough questions and know the answers with explanations. Since the Effects of Noise Reading Answers feature detailed explanations, IELTS aspirants must use them. There’s also a newly-developed effects of noise reading mock test here, inspired by Cambridge reading sample tests.

In the effects of noise reading answers, you will see two question types: Matching information and sentence completion. If you’re new to the IELTS reading test, there are 14 IELTS Reading question types to assess your English reading skills. By exploring the effects of noise reading passages, you can experience the actual difficulty level of IELTS.

Before attempting to write the Effects of Noise Reading Answers IELTS, check the IELTS reading tips

Check out our YouTube Channel to Practice Full-Length IELTS Reading Tests Daily

IELTS Reading Practice Test Demo

IELTS Reading Passage - Effects of Noise

The newly-created passage and the effects of noise reading answers are as follows.

Effects of Noise

  1. Generally, it is reasonable to suppose that we must choose peace and silence over noise. Most of us would have experienced adjusting to sleeping on top of the mountains or the village side as it was ‘very quiet’ at an early stage, an incident that reflects that humans can adapt to different levels of noises. There are also many research studies that support this thought. For instance, Glass and Singer (1972) presented humans to quick bursts of loud noise and then assessed their skills to solve issues and problems and their physiological response to the same noise. The noise was disturbing initially, then four minutes later the response were doing fine on their assignments as a control response who did not hear of that noise. It is observed that their physiological response declined quickly, same as the levels as those of the control response.
  2. Interestingly, there are limitations to the level of adaptation, and loud noise tends to be an obstacle if the individual wants to focus on more than one assignment. For instance, loud noise levels are caused with the response of the individual who needs to watch three dials at the same time, an assignment not similar to that of a pilot (an aeroplane) or like an air-traffic controller (Broadbent, 1957). Likewise, noise did not cause an impact on an individual's ability to find out a moving line with a steering wheel however it did interact or interfere with the individual's skill to redo numbers while finding it out or tracking (Finkelman and Glass, 1970).
  3. Here, the most important observation from research study on noise is that the noise was anticipated more than how loud it would be. We could ‘tune out’ severe background noises, wherever if it is louder than to work under situations with unpredictable intrusions of noise. In the Glass and Singer research study, where individuals were left to so much of noise as they were working on an assignment, some individuals could hear loud noises, and others could hear soft noises. For some individuals, the noise bursts were spaced similarly to one minute away (predictable noise); others could hear the exact frequency of noise, but the noise bursts happened at irregular timings (unpredictable noise). 
  Unpredictable Noise Predictable Noise Average
Loud noise 40.1 31.8 35.9
Soft noise 36.7 27.4 32.1
Average 38.4 29.6  

Table 1: Proofreading Errors and Noise

D. Individuals gave inputs pertaining to the predictable and unpredictable noise equally annoying, and all individuals responded at about the equal level while the noise portion of the research study. On the other hand, the diverse noise conditions had little difference when the individuals wanted to correct and proofread written material when there was no noise. As shown in Table 1 the unpredictable noise caused more mistakes in the later proofreading assignment than predictable noise; and soft, unpredictable noise merely caused little more mistakes on this assignment than the loud, predictable noise.
 
E. Seemingly, unpredictable noise causes more discomfort than predictable noise, however it takes its own time for this discomfort to take its toll in response. In this research study, predictability is not the only variable that diminishes totally or partially the bad effects of noise. The other variable is control. If the individual is aware of the fact that they could operate and control the noise system, this might reduce both its bad effects while performing and its post-performance level. It's real even if the individual decides not to turn off the noise (Glass and Singer, 1972). It is true even if the individual never actually exercises his or her option to turn the noise off (Glass and Singer, 1972). It's known that one can control the noise, and it is enough.

F. The various studies discussed till now reveal that people exposed to noise for short timings have observed only transient effects, as per the study. But the most troublesome issue about noisy environments is that living and listening to the chronic noise everyday may result in serious, prolonged effects. One of the studies suggest that this issue is a realistic one, in comparison with the elementary school students who attended classes close to the Los Angeles' busy airport with students who attended classes in less noisy neighbourhoods (Cohen et al., 1980). It was observed from the study that children from the schools where there is loud noise had higher blood pressure and tended to get distracted often than those who attended the schools where there is less noise. In addition to that, there was no sign of adjustment or adaptation to the noise. Apparently, the more the children had attended the noisy schools, the more disturbed it was. These repercussions were also long lasting and did not stop. Apart from that, there was a follow-up research study that observed that children who were shifted to less noisy environments never stopped from having greater distractibility than students who had always been in the quiet schools (Cohen et al, 1981). This experiment was done one year later. It ought to be noted that the two sets of children had been carefully analysed by the tutors in order to compare their race, caste, age, ethnic group and social classes.

Effects of Noise Reading Questions

Questions 1 - 7

This reading passage has six paragraphs, A - F.

Which paragraph contains the following information?

Write the correct letter, A - F, as your answer to each question.

  1. The other variable is control
  2. The noise was disturbing initially, then four minutes later the response were doing fine
  3. The diverse noise conditions had little difference when the individuals wanted to correct and proofread written material when there was no noise
  4. the more the children had attended the noisy schools, the more disturbed it was
  5. For some individuals, the noise bursts were spaced similarly to one minute away
  6. Noise did not cause an impact on an individual's ability to find out a moving line with a steering wheel
  7. The unpredictable noise caused more mistakes in the later proofreading assignment than predictable noise 

Also Read: IELTS Reading Locating Information

Questions 8 - 13

Complete each sentence with the correct ending

Write the correct letter a-f from the options.

8. Glass and Singer (1972) presented humans to quick bursts
9. Apparently, the more the children had attended the noisy schools
10. noise did not cause an impact on an individual's ability
11. In this research study, predictability is not the only variable
12. The noise was disturbing initially
13. The most important observation from research study on noise

  1. the more disturbed it was
  2. that diminishes totally or partially the bad effects of noise
  3. then four minutes later the response were doing fine
  4. to find out a moving line with a steering wheel
  5. of loud noise and then assessed their skills to solve issues
  6. is that the noise was anticipated more than how loud it would be

Also Read: IELTS Reading Matching Sentence Endings

Effects of Noise Reading Answers Key

The effects of noise reading answers are available here for the newly-created passage.

(Note: The text in italics is from the reading passage and shows the location from where the answer is taken or inferred. The text in the regular font explains the answer in detail.)

1. Paragraph E 

Explanation - In this research study, predictability is not the only variable that diminishes totally or partially the bad effects of noise. The other variable is control.

2. Paragraph A

Explanation - The noise was disturbing initially, then four minutes later the response were doing fine on their assignments as a control response who did not hear of that noise.

3. Paragraph D

Explanation - The diverse noise conditions had little difference when the individuals wanted to correct and proofread written material when there was no noise.

4. Paragraph F 

Explanation - In addition to that, there was no sign of adjustment or adaptation to the noise. Apparently, the more the children had attended the noisy schools, the more disturbed it was.

5. Paragraph C 

Explanation - For some individuals, the noise bursts were spaced similarly to one minute away (predictable noise); others could hear the exact frequency of noise, but the noise bursts happened at irregular timings (unpredictable noise). 

6. Paragraph B

Explanation - Likewise, noise did not cause an impact on an individual's ability to find out a moving line with a steering wheel however it did interact or interfere with the individual's skill to redo numbers while finding it out or tracking (Finkelman and Glass, 1970).

7. Paragraph D 

Explanation - The unpredictable noise caused more mistakes in the later proofreading assignment than predictable noise; and soft, unpredictable noise merely caused little more mistakes on this assignment than the loud, predictable noise.

8. E

Explanation - Glass and Singer (1972) presented humans to quick bursts of loud noise and then assessed their skills to solve issues.

9. A

Explanation - Apparently, the more the children had attended the noisy schools the more disturbed it was.

10. D

Explanation - Noise did not cause an impact on an individual's ability to find out a moving line with a steering wheel.

11. B 

Explanation - In this research study, predictability is not the only variable that diminishes totally or partially the bad effects of noise.

12. C

Explanation - The noise was disturbing initially then four minutes later the response were doing fine.

13. F

Explanation - The most important observation from research study on noise is that the noise was anticipated more than how loud it would be.

Check answers for other passages

You can get the answers for other passages below.

Conclusion

As a part of your IELTS reading preparation, never skip the “Effects of Noise Reading Answers” for both (old and new) passages, as it provides different question types. And the difficulty level is the same as the actual IELTS reading test.

Roshan.webp

About Author Roshan Sunthar

Roshan Sunthar is a study abroad expert as well as a renowned writer and author in international education. His academic excellence and 5+ years of work experience give him in-depth knowledge of international standardised exams and test preparation in IELTS, TOEFL, GRE, PTE, SAT, etc. The study materials he prepares incorporate exam-like questions. He’s also an expert in writing Statement of Purposes (SOPs) and Letter of Recommendations (LORs) for college admissions. He usually spends his leisure time watching English classics and documentaries, travelling, etc.

More Articles Post by Roshan Sunthar

Kanan.co is a trusted study abroad consultancy offering comprehensive services, resources, and solutions for students and education institutions. We support students at every stage of their global education journey, ensuring a smooth and guided experience. Along with test preparation for IELTS, GRE, TOEFL, and SAT, we provide expert services such as SOP writing, visa guidance, accommodation support, scholarship assistance, and education loan support. Our expertise and commitment to excellence make us a reliable partner for students pursuing international education.

kanan-logo1
kanan-ftr-fbkanan-ftr-igkanan-ftr-linkedinkanan-ftr-twitterkanan-ftr-youtube
kanan-ftr-phone1

+91 73555 73555

DMCA.com Protection Status
Mobile app
Mobile app

Global Headquarters

Kanan Int EdTech Inc

320 Bay Street, Suite 321 (Spaces), Toronto ON, Canada M5B 1N9

Indian Headquarters

Kanan International Pvt. Ltd.

D-wing, 2nd Floor, Trident Complex, Ellora Park Vadiwadi Road, Vadodara, Gujarat 390007

IT/ Digital Campus

Kanan International Pvt. Ltd

Old, New No 3, 2nd Floor, 1A, Dr Sadasivam Rd, T. Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600017

Our branches

  • Bardoli
  • Bharuch
  • Chennai
  • Dehradun
  • Gurugram
  • Himatnagar
  • Karnal
  • Nadiad
  • Navsari
  • Palanpur
  • Rajkot
  • Vadodara
  • Valsad
  • Vallabh Vidyanagar
  • Vapi

Copyright © 2026 KANAN.CO All rights reserved.